This handbook for design leaders contains instructions to apply IAC, the in-house method of Design Impulse to develop robust capabilities that enable a design organization to strengthen its position. We regularly update our handbook to ensure IAC’s usability. Email us if you have any questions, remarks, or suggestions regarding our handbook.

Handbook IAC: Prerequisites
Capabilities you need for applying IAC:
- Analysis
- Business analysis
- Market analysis
- Organization analysis
- Process analysis
- Design
- Business design
- Organization design
- Process design
- Strategic thinking
- Realization
- Capability development
- Change management
- Process management
- Quality management
Estimated time to observe the first effects of applying IAC:
Handbook IAC: Steps
Preparation phase
The steps in the preparation phase focus on your ambition:
Describe the current situation of your design organization.
- Describe your design organization’s context.
- Macro-environmental factors
- Political factors
- Economic factors
- Social factors
- Technological factors
- Environmental factors
- Legal factors
- Meso-environmental factors
- Threat of new entrants
- Threat of substitutes
- Bargaining power of customers
- Bargaining power of suppliers
- Competitive rivalry
- Micro-environmental factors
- Strengths
(i.e., characteristics that entail an advantage) - Weaknesses
(i.e., characteristics that entail a disadvantage) - Opportunities
(i.e., elements in the environment that could entail an advantage) - Threats
(i.e., elements in the environment that could entail a disadvantage)
- Strengths
- Macro-environmental factors
- Describe your design organization’s current way of working.
- Frameworks
- Processes
- Behaviours
- Describe your design organization’s current outcomes.
- Influence [on] decision-making
- Alignment [with]
- Involvement [in]
- Participation [in]
- Impact
- Performance
- Influence [on] decision-making
Formulate your ambition to turn design into a consistent driver of value.
- Describe your design organization’s challenges.
- Gaps
(i.e., things that your design organization should start doing) - Defects
(i.e., things that your design organization should do better) - Levers
(i.e., things that your design organization should do more)
- Gaps
- Specify which of your design organization’s outcomes you want to strengthen, given its challenges.
- Influence [on] decision-making
- Alignment [with]
- Involvement [in]
- Participation [in]
- Impact
- Performance
- Influence [on] decision-making
- Define indicators that measure the fulfilment of your ambition, with for each indicator a target value range and its current value. For example:
- Number of new product categories in an assortment.
- Costs of developing products, in an absolute sense or as a percentage of total project costs.
- Revenue from the sales of products, in an absolute sense or as a percentage of total revenue.
Estimate whether your ambition can be fulfilled.
- Assess any earlier initiatives.
- Check the availability of required resources for the new initiative.
- Personnel
- Employees from involved organizational units
- Employees from involved organizational levels
- Experts in relevant fields
- Documentation
- Organizational models
- Business models
- Standard operating procedures
- Data points
- Value data points
- Impact data points
- Performance data points
- Personnel
- Analyze whether fulfilling your ambition is worthwhile.
- Desirable
- Feasible
- Viable
Execution phase
The steps in the execution phase of IAC focus on capabilities that turn design into a consistent driver of value.
Inventory valuable capabilities that your design organization deploys in working with different actors (such as commissioners, customers, users, designers, subject matter experts, contractors, and managers). To this end, analyse end-to-end processes within your design organization’s application domains, using functional study models as a point of reference.

- Perform an act
- Perceive a situation
- Sense (e.g., see, hear, touch, smell, or taste)
- Interpret (i.e., understand)
- Evaluate (i.e., compare with a goal)
- Set a goal
- Formulate
- Consider (i.e., weigh pros and cons of)
- Accept
- Undertake an action
- Define
- Specify (i.e., visualize and detail)
- Effectuate
- Perceive a situation
- Share content
- Communicate content
- Send
- Receive
- Exchange content
- Inform [of]
- Reply [with]
- Agree on content (in a transaction; see figure below)
- Demand
- Request
- Accept
- Supply
- Promise
- Declare
- Demand
- Communicate content

- Provide a service
- Develop a service
- Conceive
- Elaborate
- Implement
- Promote a service
- Propose
- Position
- Offer
- Deliver a service
- Prepare
- Execute*
- Conclude
- Develop a service
- Administer an activity
- Direct an activity
- Designate
- Frame
- Allocate
- Manage an activity
- Plan
- Realize
- Evaluate
- Control an activity
- Steer
- Measure
- Adjust
- Direct an activity
*) Draft (i.e., create, review, and validate) a design (see figure below)
- Design brief
- Primary objective
- Key requirements
- Success criteria
- Design strategy
- Explanatory diagnosis
- Guiding principle
- Coherent actions
- Design frame
- Perspective
- Key questions
- Core values
- Design problem
- Motivational values
- Needs and desires
- Requirements
- Design concept
- Outline
- Properties
- Benefits
- Design solution
- Specification
- Properties
- Outcomes

Find valuable capabilities in your design market that would contribute to fulfilling your ambition but that your design organization does not have.
Determine the influence of valuable capabilities on your ambition fulfilment indicators as:
- Positive
- (Net) zero
- Negative
Classify each valuable capability according to its kind as:
Classify each valuable capability according to the nature of its content as:
- Knowledge
(if explicit, that is, if it can be documented as a theory) - Experience
(if implicit, that is, if it can be documented as a case, not as a theory) - Intuition
(if tacit, that is, if it can be documented as a behavior, not as a theory or a case)- Culture (if it is learned)
- Instinct (if it is innate)
For each valuable capability, determine its current position (i.e., the competitive advantage it gives to your design organization) as:
- Equal advantage
- Not scarce or difficult to obtain in your design market
- Temporary advantage
- Unused advantage
- Scarce or difficult to obtain in your design market
- Hard to mimic in your design market
- Not taking full advantage of resources in your design organization
- Strategic advantage
- Scarce or difficult to obtain in your design market
- Hard to mimic in your design market
- Taking full advantage of resources in your design organization
Rank valuable capabilities on their contributions to different aspects of your design organization.
- Reputation
- Organization strategy
- Stakeholder needs
- Technology
- Ethical conduct
- Regulatory
You may find a radar chart or spider web chart useful to visualize the ranking.
For each valuable capability, prioritize its construction in your design organization as:
- Now
- To be done first
- Next
- To be done next after the first
- Later
- To be done after the next
Acquire the content of valuable capabilities that your design organization currently does not have.
- Access and study theories or devise defensible theorems
(in case of knowledge) - Access and study cases or conduct experiments
(in case of experience) - Access and study behaviors or develop habits
(in case of culture) - Recruit and onboard new team members
(in case of instinct)
Specialize the content of valuable capabilities that currently only give an equal advantage so that new theories (knowledge), cases (experience), or behaviors (culture) can emerge.
- Substitute
- Combine
- Adjust
- Modify
- Put to another use
- Eliminate
- Reverse
Merge valuable capabilities that currently only give a temporary advantage so that new theories (knowledge), cases (experience), or behaviors (culture) can emerge.
- Join
- Unite
- Integrate
Capture and share the content of valuable capabilities that currently only give an unused advantage.
- Document, teach, and study theories
(in case of knowledge) - Document, present, and study cases
(in case of experience) - Document, show, and study behaviors
(in case of culture)
Conclusion phase
The steps in the conclusion phase of IAC focus on evaluating the fulfilment of your ambition:
Gather the outcomes of fulfilling your ambition.
- Successes
(i.e., objectives achieved exactly to the extent intended) - Windfalls
(i.e., objectives achieved to a larger extent than intended) - Setbacks
(i.e., objectives not achieved to the extent intended)
Determine causes that explain the outcomes of fulfilling your ambition as follows:
- Determine hypotheses.
- Test hypotheses.
- Confirm hypotheses.
Decide on the next move to fulfil your ambition:
- Renew
(if your ambition has been fulfilled) - Repeat
(if your ambition has not been fulfilled and still can be fulfilled) - Reformulate
(if your ambition cannot be fulfilled and needs to be adjusted)
Handbook IAC: Example concepts
In this handbook, you will find a few example concepts below. They originate from scientific and professional literature and practical experience. From time to time, we will update this non-exhaustive overview.
Strategy. Combine scale with agility. — David Butler & Linda Tischler
System. Define a portfolio strategy, identify gaps and unmet or latent needs, and define segments for customers and users. — McKinsey Design
System. Define quantified metrics, build a holistic metrics system, and define supporting operational metrics. — McKinsey Design
System. Turbocharge processes, speed up internal feedback loops, and improve handoffs. — Invision Inside Design
System. Set goals, determine ground rules, and provide facilities to acquire, create, and shareknowledge. — UNStudio
System. Cultivate trust, give your people consistent support, and change up common routines every so often to create positive surprises. — User Experience
Strategy. Represent design at the top level of the organization, improve employee experience with design, and spread design practices. — McKinsey Design
Strategy. Build up your reputation, spot talent through your network, and establish a flexible talent pipeline. — Workable
System. Describe design work in terms of business goals, collect evidence of design results, and communicate the business value of design. — BoagWorld
System. Demonstrate desired behaviours, provide motivators, and recognize and acknowledge displayed behaviours. — PositivePsychology
Strategy. Translate the corporate vision into tangible goals, center the customer, foster collaboration, and uphold operational excellence—all while expanding creative limits. — Aquent
Strategy. Form a cross-disciplinary team, further knowledge integration, and implement decision-making through consensus. — Purdue University
Strategy. Let people explore the future, get familiar with it, and work together to address the resistant factors. — Livework
Strategy. Empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test. — Stanford d.school
Strategy. To produce an innovative outcome for a complex challenge, iteratively explore, define, develop, and deliver. — the Design Council
System. Explore user experiences, discover user motives, and define user requirements. — Interaction Design Foundation
System. Recognize and remove overly complex content, organize knowledge, and filter content. — UX Collective
System. Bring ideas to fruition through a build-measure-learn feedback loop (Lean Startup). — Eric Ries
Background information
Preparation phase
To describe organizational results, IAC uses:
- For value: cost-benefit analysis.
- For impact: triple bottom line.
- For performance: performance management in business. See, for instance, Simon Kucher for an explanation.
For environmental factors, IAC prescribes the following analyses:
- Macro-environmental factors: PESTEL analysis. See, for instance, OnStrategy for an explanation with examples.
- Meso-environmental factors: Porter’s five-forces analysis. See, for instance, B2U for an explanation with examples.
- Micro-environmental factors: SWOT analysis. See, for instance, IMD for an explanation with examples.
To estimate whether an ambition can be fulfilled, IAC uses design thinking as popularized by IDEO. See, for instance, UX Design Institute for an explanation with examples.
Execution phase
IAC is based on McKinsey’s capabilities strategy for successful product development (2017).
For modeling activities, IAC utilizes various study models:
- Act: study model of purposeful action, developed by Norman (2002).
- Agree on content: study model of transaction, based on the DEMO methodology.
- Provide a service: service quality gap model.
- Promote: AIDA model for marketing.
- Manage an activity: PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, Act), also known as the Deming cycle.
For capabilities, IAC includes:
- To classify a capability’s kind: McKinsey 7S framework.
- To classify a capability’s nature: Knowledge types. See, for instance, Whatfix for definitions and examples.
- To determine a capability’s competitive advantage: VRIO analysis.
- To specialize a capability: SCAMPER.
- To capture a capability: Shadbolt & Smart (2015).
Other
See definitions for an explanation of terms used in this handbook. And below are links to our publications of supporting expertise and background knowledge.


